Re: Improvement of installation document

Hi,

I apologize that I　accidentally sent the following email to this list.
Please disregard this.

I am sorry for making a lot of noise.

Regard,

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:38:31 +0900
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> One of our clients suggested that the installation document[1] lacks description
> about requriements of installing *-devel packages. For example, postgresqlxx-devel
> is required for using --with-pgsql, and openssl-devel for --with-openssl, and so on,
> but these are not documented.
>
> [1] http://www.pgpool.net/docs/pgpool-II-3.7.4/en/html/install-pgpool.html
>
> I know the document of PostgreSQL[2] also lacks the description about openssl-devel,
> kerberos-devel, etc. (except to readline-devl). However, it would be convenient
> for users who want to install Pgpool-II from source code if the required packages
> for installation are described in the document explicitly.
>
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/install-requirements.html
>
> Is it not worth to consider this?
>
>
> BTW, the Pgpool-II doc[2] says:
>
> --with-memcached=path
> Pgpool-II binaries will use memcached for in memory query cache. You have to install libmemcached.
>
> , but maybe libmemcached-devel is correct instead of libmemcached?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
>
>
> --
> Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
>

--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>