From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Date: | 2019-03-26 08:32:52 |
Message-ID: | 20190326.173252.76626926.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello. I forgot to mention a point.
At Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:02:36 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAD21AoD7rqZPPyV7z4bku8Mn8AE2_kRdW1hTO4Lrsp+vn_U1kQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> Attached the updated version patch. 0001 patch allows all existing
> vacuum options an boolean argument. 0002 patch introduces parallel
> lazy vacuum. 0003 patch adds -P (--parallel) option to vacuumdb
> command.
> + if (IsParallelWorker())
> + msg = "scanned index \"%s\" to remove %d row versions by parallel vacuum worker";
> + else
> + msg = "scanned index \"%s\" to remove %d row versions";
> ereport(elevel,
> - (errmsg("scanned index \"%s\" to remove %d row versions",
> + (errmsg(msg,
> RelationGetRelationName(indrel),
> - vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples),
> + dead_tuples->num_tuples),
The msg prevents NLS from working. Please enclose the right-hand
literals by gettext_noop().
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-26 08:42:33 | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |
Previous Message | Jamison, Kirk | 2019-03-26 08:25:14 | RE: Timeout parameters |