From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomasz Szypowski <tomasz(dot)szypowski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions |
Date: | 2019-03-19 06:55:30 |
Message-ID: | 20190319065530.62ee4ir3e4jfkz3f@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:43:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 3. Actually, I'm kind of wondering why pg_upgrade has a --new-bindir
> > option at all, rather than just insisting on finding the new-version
> > executables in the same directory it is in. This seems like, at best,
> > a hangover from before it got into core. Even if you don't want to
> > remove the option, we could surely provide a useful default setting
> > based on find_my_exec. (I'm amused to notice that pg_upgrade
> > currently takes the trouble to find out its own path, and then does
> > precisely nothing with the information.)
>
> Good point. You are right that when it was outside of the source tree,
> and even in /contrib, that would not have worked easily. Makes sense to
> at least default to the same directory as pg_upgrade.
I guess an open question is whether we should remove the --new-bindir
option completely.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2019-03-19 07:00:58 | Re: Proposal to suppress errors thrown by to_reg*() |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-19 06:53:19 | Re: speeding up planning with partitions |