Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation
Date: 2019-03-19 03:35:07
Message-ID: 20190319033507.GP6197@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:13 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I don't view it as up for much debate.
>
> In other words, you're not willing to listen to what other people
> think about this issue.

I have listened, but unfortunately the discussion just revolves around
"oh, it isn't actually all that bad", which, no, isn't something that's
going to sway my opinion.

I suppose some might view that as being principled.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-03-19 03:40:50 Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation
Previous Message Rahila Syed 2019-03-19 03:32:48 Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VS query mean time