| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Use condition variables to wait for checkpoints. |
| Date: | 2019-03-14 00:33:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20190314003342.GD3493@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:25:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> and if you look at the test script, there is no sort of wait for the
> creation of "test1" to propagate to the slave before we try to query
> it on the slave. We'd have seen this fall over soon enough with or
> without your commit.
Oops, sorry. I was monitoring the buildfarm yesterday and did not
notice any failures. The attached should fix the problem. Does that
look fine?
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| recoveryminlsn-tap-fix.patch | text/x-diff | 705 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2019-03-14 00:35:30 | Re: pgsql: Add support for hyperbolic functions, as well as log10(). |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-03-13 23:25:37 | Re: pgsql: Use condition variables to wait for checkpoints. |