Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Date: 2019-03-13 11:56:33
Message-ID: 20190313115633.GA1878@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:09:24PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> The attached patch should do the above, on top of Michael's last
> patchset.

What you are doing here looks like a good defense in itself.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-03-13 12:02:04 Re: Use nanosleep(2) in pg_usleep, if available?
Previous Message Matsumura, Ryo 2019-03-13 11:55:12 RE: SQL statement PREPARE does not work in ECPG