Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Regina Obe <r(at)pcorp(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing
Date: 2019-03-13 02:19:06
Message-ID: 20190313021906.GQ13812@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 07:01:17PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think this is even close to popular enough to incur the
> maybe of a separate function / more complicated interface. By this
> logic we can change basically no APIs anymore.

Well, if folks here think that it is not worth worrying about, I won't
cry on that either. If only the original API is kept, could it just
be possible to make it extensible with some bits16 flags then? Adding
only a boolean is not really appealing.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-13 02:21:59 Re: pgsql: Add support for hyperbolic functions, as well as log10().
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-13 02:16:21 Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums