Re: Special role for subscriptions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Дмитрий Сарафанников <dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Андрей Бородин <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Владимир Бородин <root(at)simply(dot)name>
Subject: Re: Special role for subscriptions
Date: 2019-03-12 02:39:15
Message-ID: 20190312023915.GE13812@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:32:10PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> * Is the original idea of a special role still viable?

In my opinion, that part may be valuable. The latest patches proposed
change the way tables are filtered and listed on the subscription
side, lowering the permission to spawn a new thread and to connect to a
publication server by just being a database owner instead of being a
superuser, and that's quite a gap.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-12 02:47:29 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-12 02:28:59 Re: Unaccent extension python script Issue in Windows