Re: First SVG graphic

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First SVG graphic
Date: 2019-03-09 15:54:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> As an example of such differences I append two files: gin.svg ("Optimized
> SVG" plus my manually optimizations; the originally uploaded file) and
> gin_pure_opt.svg (pure "Optimized SVG").
> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use
> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the
> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direct
> readability of the files suffers more or less.

Uh, so really there is plain SVG, "Optimized SVG", and readable SVG. I
am thinking you should store just "Optimized SVG", and provide a shell
script to convert to readable SVG for those that want it.

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to


Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-03-09 16:49:31 Re: First SVG graphic
Previous Message Jürgen Purtz 2019-03-09 11:17:33 Re: First SVG graphic