|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>|
|Subject:||Re: First SVG graphic|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> As an example of such differences I append two files: gin.svg ("Optimized
> SVG" plus my manually optimizations; the originally uploaded file) and
> gin_pure_opt.svg (pure "Optimized SVG").
> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use
> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the
> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direct
> readability of the files suffers more or less.
Uh, so really there is plain SVG, "Optimized SVG", and readable SVG. I
am thinking you should store just "Optimized SVG", and provide a shell
script to convert to readable SVG for those that want it.
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
|Next Message||Tom Lane||2019-03-09 16:49:31||Re: First SVG graphic|
|Previous Message||Jürgen Purtz||2019-03-09 11:17:33||Re: First SVG graphic|