| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Asim R P <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| Date: | 2019-03-07 17:49:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20190307174916.haalz6gcg6a7e5ks@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-07 08:52:21 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:11 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > slot that's compatible with the "target" table. You can get compatible
> > slot callbakcs by calling table_slot_callbacks(), or directly create one
> > by calling table_gimmegimmeslot() (likely to be renamed :)).
>
> Hmm. I assume the issue is that table_createslot() was already taken
> for another purpose, so then when you needed another callback you went
> with table_givemeslot(), and then when you needed a third API to do
> something in the same area the best thing available was
> table_gimmeslot(), which meant that the fourth API could only be
> table_gimmegimmeslot().
>
> Does that sound about right?
It was 3 AM, and I thought it was hilarious...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-03-07 17:51:33 | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-03-07 17:45:38 | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |