Re: bgwriter_lru_maxpages limits in PG 10 sample conf

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bgwriter_lru_maxpages limits in PG 10 sample conf
Date: 2019-03-04 23:49:18
Message-ID: 20190304234918.shjjjjul6d357snf@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:28:44AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Hello
>
> postgresql.conf.sample was changed recently in REL_10_STABLE (commit ab1d9f066aee4f9b81abde6136771debe0191ae8)
> So config will be changed in next minor release anyway. We have another reason to not fix bgwriter_lru_maxpages comment?

Frankly, I was surprised postgresql.conf.sample was changed in a back
branch since it will cause people who diff $PGDATA/postgresql.conf with
share/postgresql.conf.sample to see differences they didn't make.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-03-04 23:54:02 Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-03-04 23:47:00 Inheriting table AMs for partitioned tables