| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online verification of checksums |
| Date: | 2019-03-04 03:06:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20190304030616.GF1999@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:51:48AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> I still think that an external checksum verification tool has some
> merit, given that basebackup does it and the current offline requirement
> is really not useful in practise.
I am not going to argue again about the way checksum verification is
done in a base backup.. :)
Being able to do an online verification of checksums has a lot of
value, do not take me wrong, and an SQL interface to do that does not
prevent having a frontend wrapper using it.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-04 03:09:41 | Re: Online verification of checksums |
| Previous Message | Ideriha, Takeshi | 2019-03-04 03:03:51 | RE: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |