Re: Another way to fix inherited UPDATE/DELETE

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another way to fix inherited UPDATE/DELETE
Date: 2019-02-19 22:44:45
Message-ID: 20190219224445.6ecrshqfey7mc6qx@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-02-19 16:48:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I have no idea how this might play with the pluggable-storage work.

I don't think it'd have a meaningful impact, except for needing changes
to an overlapping set of lines. But given the different timeframes, I'd
not expect a problem with that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-02-19 22:53:19 Re: Another way to fix inherited UPDATE/DELETE
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-19 22:41:40 Re: propagating replica identity to partitions