From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <bernd(dot)helmle(at)credativ(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums |
Date: | 2019-02-18 03:24:35 |
Message-ID: | 20190218032435.GC15532@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 09:00:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Well, pg_rewind is also using kB, so should I switch it back to that?
I am not sure which one is better, sorry :)
There is an argument for switching pg_rewind to use MB as well. I
don't expect pg_rewind to transfer gigs of data, but it could make the
maths harder for a newcomer if it transfers a lot of data.
> It looks like the progress reporting is otherwise quite similar, so what
> exactly did you have in mind?
I was thinking about a routine in src/common/ or such at this time.
The tools have separate goals though, so it looks sensible as well to
keep two routines. I am fine to let that up to you.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-18 03:36:48 | Re: BUG #15548: Unaccent does not remove combining diacritical characters |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-18 03:19:54 | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo |