Re: Statement-level rollback

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Statement-level rollback
Date: 2019-02-12 22:13:45
Message-ID: 20190212221345.GA17350@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Feb-04, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:38:27AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Is this still in development? Or should we mark this as returned with
> > feedback?
>
> Marked as returned with feedback, as it has already been two months.
> If you have an updated patch set, please feel free to resubmit.

It was reasonable to close this patch as returned-with-feedback in
January commitfest, but what you did here was first move it to the March
commitfest and then close it as returned-with-feedback in the March
commitfest, which has not even started. That makes no sense.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2019-02-12 22:38:28 Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-12 22:00:22 Re: Too rigorous assert in reorderbuffer.c