Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-09 18:56:46
Message-ID: 20190209185646.GA12234@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Feb-09, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I'll put this in the comment.

Attached.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-fix-trigger-drop.patch text/x-diff 2.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-02-09 20:24:53 Re: dsa_allocate() faliure
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-02-09 18:09:59 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries