|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|To:||Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Problem while updating a foreign table pointing to a partitioned table on foreign server|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:55:18PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> I 100% agree with Tom, and actually, I tried to address his comments, but I
> haven't come up with a clear solution for that yet. I really want to
> address this, but I won't have much time to work on that at least until
> after this development cycle, so what I'm thinking is to mark this as
> Returned with feedback, or if possible, to move this to the 2019-07 CF.
Simply marking it as returned with feedback does not seem adapted to
me as we may lose track of it. Moving it to the future CF would make
more sense in my opinion.
|Next Message||Haribabu Kommi||2019-02-08 01:24:58||Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VS query mean time|
|Previous Message||David Rowley||2019-02-08 01:00:49||Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests|