From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
Date: | 2019-02-07 12:18:04 |
Message-ID: | 20190207121804.GA18834@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 12:49:43PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Anyway, that's all cosmetics. Are there any more functional or
> correctness issues to be addressed?
Not that I can think of. At least this evening.
> Another thing I was thinking of: We need some database-global tests.
> For example, at some point during development, I had broken some variant
> of REINDEX DATABASE. Where could we put those tests? Maybe with
> reindexdb?
Having some coverage in the TAP tests of reindexdb is a good idea.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2019-02-07 12:18:45 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-07 12:02:02 | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |