Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed
Date: 2019-02-05 16:59:33
Message-ID: 20190205165933.GJ32538@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 06:34:50AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> >> Wow, thank you so much for your hard work. The last CF for PG 12 should be tough...
>
> > Agreed. I am somewhat concerned about this and am wondering what we can
> > do now to limit problems.
>
> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort
> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have
> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push
> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the
> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter
> ones done.

The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting
delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-02-05 17:02:23 Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-02-05 16:57:05 Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple