| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
| Date: | 2019-02-04 06:21:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20190204062146.GJ4092@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:22:48AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If we have well-designed answers to these questions, I'd imagine that
> the actual feature patch would be quite small. I was very surprised to
> see how large this patch is and how much code is moves around without
> much explanation. I don't think it's worth reviewing this patch any
> further. It needs several steps back and some fundamental design and
> refactoring work.
Marked as returned with feedback. This thread has stalled.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-04 06:21:50 | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-04 06:19:10 | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE on standby servers |