From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Костя Кузнецов <chapaev28(at)ya(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM
Date: 2019-02-04 02:13:26
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 06:26:18PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> Heikki, how do you think, is implementing our own radix tree for
> this is viable solution?
> I've written working implementation with 4-level statically typed
> tree. If we follow this route, probably, there must be tests for
> this data structure.

(Note that the latest patch does not apply.)
Heikki, are you planning to answer to the questions and/or review the
patch? I have moved it to next CF for now.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 02:15:07 Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 02:11:03 Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment