Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com" <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: 2019-02-03 11:00:11
Message-ID: 20190203110011.pmegsgqmbbo5ysnm@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-02-01 14:14:27 -0500, Jesper Pedersen wrote:

> From 4b5856725af5d971a26a2ba150c1067ee21bb242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: jesperpedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:05:31 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Highlight that the --jobs option isn't passed down to
> vacuumdb by default.

This is currently marked as waiting for author, which doesn't seem
accurate. I've set it to needs review, and moved it to the next
commitfest - please revert if that's not accurate.

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2019-02-03 11:04:37 Re: Ryu floating point output patch
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-02-03 10:58:11 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries