Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hironobu SUZUKI <hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Date: 2019-02-02 01:16:56
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:21:27AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Here is an updated patch using this marker.
> I noticed that some instances use a closing "*-----" sequence, but it does
> not seem useful, so I left it out.
> I have also tried to improve a few comments, and moved a declaration into a
> loop because I did not like the pg-indented version much.

This patch is marked as ready for committer for some time now, and it
has rotten, so I am moving it to next CF, waiting on author.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-02 01:18:34 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-02 01:05:20 Re: initdb --allow-group-access behaviour in windows