Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?
Date: 2019-01-29 16:51:37
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2019-01-29 10:31:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2019-Jan-28, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I do like planner/pathnodes.h as a name, FWIW.
> Yeah, I think I'll go with pathnodes.h. We'd probably keep using that
> for the Path node typedefs themselves, even if somebody comes up with
> a design for splitting out other things.


FWIW, I can live with the #ifndef, #define, typedef .. #endif thing, I
just don't think it's pretty.


Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-01-29 16:52:25 Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2019-01-29 16:49:29 Re: Follow-up on INSERT INTO ... SET ...