Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables
Date: 2019-01-23 21:13:14
Message-ID: 201901232113.m74gcwkpkenp@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jan-22, Amit Langote wrote:

> On 2019/01/22 8:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hi Amit,
> >
> > Will you please rebase 0002? Please add your proposed tests cases to
> > it, too.
>
> Done. See the attached patches for HEAD and PG 11.

I'm not quite sure I understand why the one in DefineIndex needs the
deps but nothing else does. I fear that you added that one just to
appease the existing test that breaks otherwise, and I worry that with
that addition we're papering over some other, more fundamental bug.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2019-01-23 22:08:56 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-23 21:10:37 Re: inherited primary key misbehavior