Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at, kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Date: 2019-01-18 00:15:24
Message-ID: 20190118.091524.1222470600446596277.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 18:03, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
>> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 01:02, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp]
>> >> >> But pg_is_in_recovery() returns true even for a promoting standby. So
>> >> >> you have to wait and retry to send pg_is_in_recovery() until it
>> >> >> finishes the promotion to find out it is now a primary. I am not sure
>> >> >> if backend out to be responsible for this process. If not, libpq
>> would
>> >> >> need to handle it but I doubt it would be possible.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, the application needs to retry connection attempts until success.
>> >> That's not different from PgJDBC and other DBMSs.
>> >>
>> >> I don't know what PgJDBC is doing, however I think libpq needs to do
>> >> more than just retrying.
>> >>
>> >> 1) Try to find a node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false. If
>> >> found, then we assume that is the primary. We also assume that
>> >> other nodes are standbys. done.
>> >>
>> >> 2) If there's no node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false, then
>> >> we need to retry until we find it. To not retry forever, there
>> >> should be a timeout counter parameter.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > IIRC this is essentially what pgJDBC does.
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying that. Pgpool-II also does that too. Seems like a
>> common technique to find out a primary node.
>>
>>
> Checking the code I see we actually use show transaction_read_only.
>
> Sorry for the confusion

So if all PostgreSQL servers returns transaction_read_only = on, how
does pgJDBC find the primary node?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-18 00:21:08 Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-01-18 00:08:45 RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority