| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2019-01-17 01:16:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20190117011638.GC2036@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:59:31PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> That's my opinion too, but I was outvoted in another subthread -- see
> https://postgr.es/m/20181214144529.wvmjwmy7wxgmgyb3@alvherre.pgsql
> Stephen Frost, Andrew Gierth and Andres Freund all voted to put
> CONCURRENTLY outside the parens. It seems we now have three votes to
> put it *in* the parens (you, Peter Eisentraut, me). I guess more votes
> are needed to settle this issue.
Sure, let's see. I would have been in the crowd of not using
parenthetised grammar five years ago, but the recent deals with other
commands worry me, as we would repeat the same errors.
> My opinion is that if we had had parenthesized options lists back when
> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was invented, we would have put it there.
> But we were young and needed the money ...
:)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-01-17 01:19:16 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-01-17 01:12:26 | Re: [HACKERS] generated columns |