Re: strange valgrind failures (again)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange valgrind failures (again)
Date: 2019-01-15 02:11:30
Message-ID: 20190115021130.fn5glrakkijmirjk@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-01-15 03:07:10 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I've started observing funny valgrind failures on Fedora 28, possibly
> after upgrading from 3.14.0-1 to 3.14.0-7 a couple of days ago. This
> time it does not seem like platform-specific issues, though - the
> failures all look like this:

Any chance you're compiling without USE_VALGRIND defined? IIRC these are
precisely what the VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED calls in inval.c are
intended to fight:
/*
* Define padding bytes in SharedInvalidationMessage structs to be
* defined. Otherwise the sinvaladt.c ringbuffer, which is accessed by
* multiple processes, will cause spurious valgrind warnings about
* undefined memory being used. That's because valgrind remembers the
* undefined bytes from the last local process's store, not realizing that
* another process has written since, filling the previously uninitialized
* bytes
*/
VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED(&msg, sizeof(msg));

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-01-15 02:23:35 Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-01-15 02:07:10 strange valgrind failures (again)