Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg(at)bec(dot)de>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg(at)bec(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date: 2019-01-06 14:53:17
Message-ID: 20190106145317.GA17679@britannica.bec.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:11:55AM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> What I'm most interested in is how long it took to generate the hash
> function in hash2.c?

It's within the noise floor of time(1) on my laptop, e.g. ~1ms.

Joerg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2019-01-06 15:28:11 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-01-06 14:51:48 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option