Re: removal of dangling temp tables

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: removal of dangling temp tables
Date: 2018-12-28 13:25:45
Message-ID: 201812281325.g6m75ehwqq4p@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Dec-28, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:05:34AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > The server code allocates arrays, but that's fine because that code is
> > recompiled. Extensions only pass pointers around -- they don't create
> > any additional arrays.
>
> There are many exotic extensions which could be using sizeof(PGPROC)
> as that's a popular structure,

Can you show one instance of this?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2018-12-28 13:27:58 Re: Poor buildfarm coverage of strong-random alternatives
Previous Message Adrien NAYRAT 2018-12-28 12:10:38 Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)