| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minor comment fix for pg_config_manual.h |
| Date: | 2018-12-28 03:37:41 |
| Message-ID: | 201812280337.4a5kfhhzeje3@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-28, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 09:36:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > like the attached perhaps? At the same time I am thinking about
> > reformulating the second sentence as well..
> >
> > /*
> > - * This is default value for wal_segment_size to be used at initdb when run
> > - * without --walsegsize option. Must be a valid segment size.
> > + * This is the default value for wal_segment_size to be used when initdb is run
> > + * without the --wal-segsize option. It must be a valid segment size.
> > */
> > #define DEFAULT_XLOG_SEG_SIZE (16*1024*1024)
>
> So, any objections with this change? If somebody has a better
> wording, please feel free to chime in.
Looks good to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2018-12-28 04:21:30 | add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-12-28 03:36:27 | Re: Alter table documentation page (again) |