Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date: 2018-12-27 22:04:41
Message-ID: 201812272204.fcmhdb3lrsgv@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Dec-27, Tom Lane wrote:

> I poked around a little on my own machines, and I can confirm that
> Getopt::Long is present in a default Perl install-from-source at
> least as far back as perl 5.6.1. It's barely conceivable that some
> packager might omit it from their minimal package, but Red Hat,
> Apple, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include it. So it sure looks to
> me like relying on it should be non-problematic.

In Debian it's included in package perl-modules-5.24, which packages
perl and libperl5.24 depend on. I suppose it's possible to install
perl-base and not install perl-modules, but it'd be a really bare-bones
machine. I'm not sure it's possible to build Postgres in such a
machine.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2018-12-27 22:15:55 Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2018-12-27 21:55:43 Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option