| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature: temporary materialized views |
| Date: | 2018-12-27 13:15:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20181227131508.3ortcy3ug6gvw45k@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-27, Mitar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made a new version of the patch. I added tests and changes to the
> docs and made sure various other aspects of this change for as well. I
> think this now makes temporary materialized views fully implemented
> and that in my view patch is complete. If there is anything else to
> add, please let me know, I do not yet have much experience
> contributing here. What are next steps? Do I just wait for it to be
> included into Commitfest? Do I add it there myself?
Yes, please add it yourself to the commitfest.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-27 13:19:53 | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2018-12-27 12:57:26 | Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |