| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
| Date: | 2018-12-26 16:38:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20181226163840.GE416@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> In my hands, the only part of the low-level parsing code that
> commonly shows up as interesting in profiles is the Bison engine.
Should we be considering others? As I understand it, steps have been
made in this field since yacc was originally designed. Is LALR
actually suitable for languages like SQL, or is it just there for
historical reasons?
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-26 16:43:36 | Re: Shared Memory: How to use SYSV rather than MMAP ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-26 16:22:39 | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |