Re: CF app feature request

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF app feature request
Date: 2018-12-23 14:59:22
Message-ID: 20181223145922.g2f54pd54s4hullx@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Dec-23, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:52 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:30:38PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > On 2018-Nov-20, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Certainly not higher than having the dropdown for entry author/reviewer
> > > be sorted alphabetically ... *wink* *wink*
> >
> > More *wink* *wink*
>
> Here's a slightly late response to that winking :P
>
> They *are* sorted. By lastname. Should I take all this winking to mean that
> people would prefer them being sorted by firstname? :)

Oh, wow. That's not at all obvious ... the fact that there's Scherbaum
as the first entry, and Wang at the fifth position, threw me off.

I can find entries easily enough knowing this. But I think it would
make more sense to order by the complete string that makes up the name.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Boguk 2018-12-23 15:28:11 Re: Query planner / Analyse statistics bad estimate rows=1 with maximum statistics 10000 on PostgreSQL 10.2
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-12-23 14:33:23 Re: Speeding up text_position_next with multibyte encodings