| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com, euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query |
| Date: | 2018-12-19 11:14:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20181219111459.x7ti3ibr3t35pvtr@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-17, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Although #1 seems cleaner to me, the fear of inadvertent removal
> of all queries with quite-common usage wins. So I vote for #4
> for now, supposing pg_stat_statements_reset(0, 0, 0) as
> all-clear.
Right -- also keeping in mind that 0 is the default value too, so the
old spelling of pg_stat_statements_reset() has the same behavior as
previously, ie., remove everything.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-19 11:15:18 | Re: What to name the current heap after pluggable storage / what to rename? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-12-19 11:02:38 | Re: What to name the current heap after pluggable storage / what to rename? |