Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?
Date: 2018-12-17 16:59:28
Message-ID: 20181217165928.nehzyfo2ufy7hguk@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2018-12-17 11:52:03 -0500, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> While a dozen lines in pgstrsignal.c certainly are not worth worrying
> over, getting rid of the configure test for sys_siglist[] would save
> some cycles on every build. So I'm tempted to drop it. Thoughts?

Removing it makes sense to me.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-17 17:03:29 Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-17 16:52:03 Re: Why aren't we using strsignal(3) ?