Re: Thinking about EXPLAIN ALTER TABLE

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thinking about EXPLAIN ALTER TABLE
Date: 2018-12-11 04:34:54
Message-ID: 20181211043454.GD416@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:25:12AM +0900, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > I suggest ALTER TABLE should respond to a parameter setting of ddl_dry_run
> > > = on, so the whole world doesn't need to rewrite its syntax to support the
> > > new option.
> >
> > We were just busy shooting down a different suggestion of
> > behavior-changing GUCs. A GUC that turns all ALTERs into no-ops
> > sure seems like a foot-gun to me.
>
> Yeah, I like EXPLAIN better.

+1 for EXPLAIN

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-11 05:22:49 Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-11 04:19:18 Re: Thinking about EXPLAIN ALTER TABLE