Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: chjischj(at)163(dot)com, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock
Date: 2018-12-04 17:01:04
Message-ID: 20181204170104.kh3rnocd7tz7ntpz@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-11-10 17:42:16 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:46 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> > Teodor: Do you think that the issue is fixable? It looks like there
> > are serious issues with the design of 218f51584d5 to me. I don't think
> > the general "there can't be any inserters at this subtree" thing works
> > given that we have to couple buffer locks when moving right for other
> > reasons. We call ginStepRight() within ginFinishSplit(), for reasons
> > that date back to bug fix commit ac4ab97e from 2013 -- that detail is
> > probably important, because it seems to be what breaks the subtree
> > design (we don't delete in two phases or anything in GIN).
>
> Ping?
>
> This is a thorny problem, and I'd like to get your input soon. I
> suspect that reverting 218f51584d5 may be the ultimate outcome, even
> though it's a v10 feature.

Teodor, any chance for a response here? It's not OK to commit something
and then just not respond to bug-reports, especially when they're well
diagnose and clearly point towards issues in a commit of yours.

Alexander, CCing you, perhaps you could point the thread out to Teodor?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-12-04 17:12:46 proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-12-04 16:37:16 Re: Minor typo