Re: Removing remaining parallel-build hazards in ecpg

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing remaining parallel-build hazards in ecpg
Date: 2018-11-30 01:50:04
Message-ID: 20181130015004.GD2267@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:15:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm also wondering whether to back-patch such a change. Since we've
> not heard field complaints that match up to this problem, it may be
> that it's unlikely enough that fixing it in HEAD is good enough.

HEAD sounds good enough for to me. Thanks for looking at those issues!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-11-30 02:00:42 Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-30 01:48:00 Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm