Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date: 2018-11-29 21:41:12
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2018-11-29 16:34:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I was disappointed too. OpenSSL has had a squirrelly enough track
> record that it'd be nice not to be totally dependent on it.

GnuTLS seems, if anything, worse though. There's obviously good reasons
to add support for TLS libraries that make it easier to use PG on
certain platforms, but GnuTLS doesn't achieve that. So I don't think
this is too sad.

- Andres

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-11-29 21:48:50 Re: New GUC to sample log queries
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2018-11-29 21:38:03 Re: Markdown format output for psql, design notes