Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net>
Cc: jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Date: 2018-11-28 01:27:13
Message-ID: 20181128012713.GF30707@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:44:02PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net> wrote:
> >>> I'm running performance tests for my application at version 11.1 and
> >>> encountered queries with high planning time compared to the same planning,
> >>> running at versions 10.5 and 11.0.
>
> I was able to reproduce this behavior.

I take that back, in part..

My query (with One-Time Filter: false) has high planning time under 11.0, also:

| Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=24)
| One-Time Filter: false
|Time: 48335.098 ms (00:48.335)

Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-28 01:32:11 Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-28 01:17:12 Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sanyo Moura 2018-11-28 01:36:09 Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Previous Message Sanyo Moura 2018-11-28 01:00:39 Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0