| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording |
| Date: | 2018-11-27 01:54:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20181127015443.GB16835@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote:
> Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
>
> "In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
>
> would be more correct if it read as follows
>
> "In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
>
> as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the same architecture ...
I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might
matter, though I can't think of any now.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-11-28 11:00:31 | Return codes for archive and restore commands |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-11-27 01:44:30 | Re: missing windows info |