Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Date: 2018-11-27 00:43:17
Message-ID: 20181127004317.lktrahwvvwfb3dfm@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-11-26 19:34:03 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> These two things seem entirely independent in my view, so I'm really not
> sure that I'm following what you're getting at.

All I said is that I don't think it's a reasonable policy to mark all
functions that potentially could change across major versions as
immutable. I've no problem with changing pg_config in particular,
especially as it - as has been pointed - clearly can change in minor
versions / recompiles.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2018-11-27 00:47:06 Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-11-27 00:40:13 Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings