| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API |
| Date: | 2018-11-25 22:37:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20181125223702.GR3415@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Sergei Kornilov (sk(at)zsrv(dot)org) wrote:
> > Why don't we put recovery entries into postgresql.recovery.conf or such?
> > And overwrite rather than append?
> Appending to postgressql.auto.conf instead of writing new hardcoded file was proposed here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQ-Grduc-0WSsK4-VXo%2B1CB%3DyDS9NMU0NEp%2Bc%2Bffnz0UQ%40mail.gmail.com
Thanks, yes, I saw that but I don't think it really contemplated the
issues that arise from that approach, as I outlined.
Thanks again!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-25 23:01:26 | Re: Doc patch on psql output formats |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-25 22:14:41 | Python versions (was Re: RHEL 8.0 build) |