Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?
Date: 2018-11-24 01:18:17
Message-ID: 20181124011817.GB22038@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:32:36PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 17:03, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's a patch for that. Parking here until January's commitfest.
>
> And another, now rebased atop of de38ce1b8 (which I probably should
> have waited for).

You have just gained a reviewer. The current inconsistent state is
rather bad I think, so I'll try to look at that before January. Now
there are other things waiting in the queue...
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-24 01:35:03 Re: pgsql: Add WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH pseudo-event.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-24 01:15:30 Re: Add extension options to control TAP and isolation tests