| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction |
| Date: | 2018-11-17 00:46:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20181117004642.hushozrhxs7v72qo@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-11-13 15:30:21 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> What I'm now planning to do is to go through the big comment in
> tuptable.h and update that to the new world. While I'm not convinced
> that that that's the best place for it, it needs to be accurate.
>
> Furthermore:
> - More comment polishing
> - I'll probably split the commits up a bit further (particulary JIT
> ignoring virtual tuple slots, inlining the hot path of
> slot_getsomeattrs())
> - serious commit message polishing
I've done all of that now, and pushed it. Thanks Ashutosh, Amit
Khandekar and everyone else.
On to pluggable storage...
Regards,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2018-11-17 01:23:44 | Re: pg11.1 jit segv |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-17 00:45:25 | Re: Why do pg_upgrade's test use the serial schedule? (actual thread) |