Re: wal_dump output on CREATE DATABASE

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jean-Christophe Arnu <jcarnu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal_dump output on CREATE DATABASE
Date: 2018-11-16 12:16:04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:05:00PM +0100, Jean-Christophe Arnu wrote:
> As I said, I don't know whether it's relevant to perform these changes or
> not. If the A/B/C notation is to be generalized, it would be worth document it
> in the SGML file. If not, the first patch provided should be enough.

Just applying the first patch would be fine in my opinion.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-16 13:31:03 Re: ALTER INDEX ... ALTER COLUMN not present in dump
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-11-16 12:00:39 Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query