| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg11.1 jit segv |
| Date: | 2018-11-16 00:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20181116001751.z6kihenttqftrrpf@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-11-15 18:11:05 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:03:34PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Verbose plan, munged for brevity/sanity due to joining wide tables, and
> > redacted since the view probably has to be considered proprietary. Hopefully
> > the remaining bits are still useful. I replaced column names with x.
>
> Actually the view isn't as intricate as I thought, but I'd like to avoid
> publishing it for sake of simplicity. I replaced the view with its underlying
> table and now I get:
>
> [pryzbyj(at)database ~]$ time psql ts -f tmp/sql-jit-crash-2018-11-15.jtp
> psql:tmp/sql-jit-crash-2018-11-15.jtp:12: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 2447889552
>
> It's unclear if that's a useful hint, a separate problem, or a nonissue..
It's probably the same / closely related issue. ISTM that JITed
deforming either doesn't deform correctly, or skips deforming
erroneously.
I'm about to commit some changes to 12/master that'd possibly make it
easier to find issues like this. Is there any chance that it's easier to
repro this on master than making a reproducible test case?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2018-11-16 00:36:57 | Re: pg11.1 jit segv |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2018-11-16 00:11:05 | Re: pg11.1 jit segv |