Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation
Date: 2018-11-15 08:59:36
Message-ID: 20181115085936.gq5l675oaf265c5u@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Nov-15, Laurenz Albe wrote:

> This new option would not only mitigate the long shared_buffers scan,
> it would also get rid of the replication conflict caused by the
> AccessExclusiveLock taken during truncation, which is discussed in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c9374921e50a5e8fb1ecf04eb8c6ebc3%40postgrespro.ru
> and seems to be a more difficult problem than anticipated.

FWIW I was just reminded yesterday that the AEL-for-truncation has been
diagnosed to be a severe problem in production, and with no other
solution in sight, I propose to move forward with the stop-gap.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kuntal Ghosh 2018-11-15 09:03:12 Re: In-place updates and serializable transactions
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2018-11-15 08:41:35 Re: In-place updates and serializable transactions